XML RSSSubscribe

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

Home
Globlog
Tributes
Australia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Belgium
China
Colombia
Czech Republic
El Salvador
East Germany
England
Estonia
France
Hungary
Iran
Ireland
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Malawi
Mexico
Netherlands
Northern Ireland
Norway
Panama
Philippines
Qatar
Romania
Scotland
Svalbard
Thailand
Turkey
UAE
UK
USA
Wales
Contact
Global News
NewsLetter
Photo Gallery
Search
Links
AnderWool
Mark Twain Trips
YOUR Trips
Family & Friends
 

Obama in Oslo

PRESIDENT OBAMA’S Oslo speech could have been titled “the ambiguities of history.’’ That the president spoke with self-awareness from within those ambiguities made the speech important.

Barack Obama at the First Presidential Debate 2008, Oxford, MS




Barack Obama at the First Presidential Debate 2008, Oxford, MS

Photographic Print


Buy at AllPosters.com



Two notes of ambiguity stood out. First, that his “labors on the world stage’’ have not merited the Nobel Peace Prize. His “accomplishments are slight,’’ yet there he was in receipt of the highest honor. Second, that he was “responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle’’ where they “will kill, and. . .be killed.’’ Since when is the peace prize awarded for war?


Those ambiguities were enough to prompt skepticism and even anger, especially from many who opposed the escalation of the war in Afghanistan. I count myself among those so opposed, yet oddly the president’s stance in the thicket of such contradiction gave his remarks resonance. He spoke, for example, of the just war tradition, and like many war-leaders before him, he drew it around himself as a defensive cloak. Usually, that’s the end of it. Just war rhetoric produces a complacent resignation. Violence is a given in the human condition. “Evil does exist in the world.’’ The solution to violence is yet more violence. Too bad, but that’s the way it is.

Yet President Obama struck a different note. Having invoked just war, he observed how, precisely from within its tradition, “the capacity of human beings to think up new ways to kill one another proved inexhaustible.’’ After the total wars of the 20th century, “it became clear to victor and vanquished alike that the world needed institutions to prevent another world war.’’ Either humans will put an end to war, in John Kennedy’s formulation, or war will put an end to human beings. Following World War II, institutions of a new order were constructed, yet “a decade into a new century, this old architecture is buckling under the weight of new threats.’’ What is required now, Obama said, is thinking “in new ways about the notions of just war.’’

Click here to post comments.

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Norway
.





CIVIL RIGHTS
for the UNBORN!



Site Build It!